And then he promptly proves their point by torturing them briefly, and is then deleted accidentally by Kinger, which I think is supposed to reinforce the allegory by showing what it’s like to live in a post-religious society. Parts of the circus literally crumble and fall away, like parts of old societal cliques did after the Church lost popular control of much of the world.
If it is an allegory for religion, then it’s well-written. If not, it’s even better-written because it’s compelling regardless. ♦